Watch, Follow, &
Connect with Us

For forums, blogs and more please visit our
Developer Tools Community.


Welcome, Guest
Guest Settings
Help

Thread: Uninitialized Debug Process - RAD Studio 10.2 - C++ Builder


This question is not answered. Helpful answers available: 2. Correct answers available: 1.


Permlink Replies: 2 - Last Post: Jul 12, 2017 10:00 AM Last Post By: Sébastien CARON...
Sébastien CARON...

Posts: 3
Registered: 6/24/17
Uninitialized Debug Process - RAD Studio 10.2 - C++ Builder  
Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this thread Reply
  Posted: Jul 10, 2017 6:02 AM
Hello,

When i try to execute my program from the IDE, half of the times it doesnt start after compilation, but i can see the .exe process on the task manager. I cant manually kill it, because protected by the IDE.
When i try to detach the debug session, i have this message from IDE : Time limit exceeded to kill the process.
When i try to terminate the debug session :
Fatal debugger error during process reset: "Uninitialized Debug Process". Please save your work and restart RAD Studio 10.2

I tried to rebuild the entire project with 10.2, but problem is still here.

Any idea ?

Thanks.

Edited by: Sébastien CARON CARON on Jul 12, 2017 10:00 AM
Sébastien CARON...

Posts: 3
Registered: 6/24/17
Re: Uninitialized Debug Process - RAD Studio 10.2 - C++ Builder  
Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this thread Reply
  Posted: Jul 11, 2017 2:51 AM   in response to: Sébastien CARON... in response to: Sébastien CARON...
And it doesnt even enter on the 1st function WINAPI _tWinMain(HINSTANCE, HINSTANCE, LPTSTR params, int)
Sébastien CARON...

Posts: 3
Registered: 6/24/17
Re: Uninitialized Debug Process - RAD Studio 10.2 - C++ Builder  
Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this thread Reply
  Posted: Jul 12, 2017 7:38 AM   in response to: Sébastien CARON... in response to: Sébastien CARON...
More information :

If I manualy do "Make" before "Execute", problem never occurs.
Legend
Helpful Answer (5 pts)
Correct Answer (10 pts)

Server Response from: ETNAJIVE02