Welcome, Guest
Guest Settings
Help

Thread: G+ C++ Builder group and 10.2 discussions



Permlink Replies: 5 - Last Post: Mar 22, 2017 1:37 PM Last Post By: Brett Wilton Threads: [ Previous | Next ]
Brett Wilton

Posts: 44
Registered: 10/1/11
G+ C++ Builder group and 10.2 discussions
Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this thread Reply
  Posted: Mar 20, 2017 12:56 PM
C++ Builder Developers Goggle+ Group and has some discussions on David Middleton's posts on 10.2 Tokyo linker posts Part 1 and Part2

https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/118315259185736124693

Just another place to discuss C++ Builder for those interested
Johannes Weinert

Posts: 70
Registered: 7/19/02
Re: G+ C++ Builder group and 10.2 discussions
Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this thread Reply
  Posted: Mar 21, 2017 1:42 AM   in response to: Brett Wilton in response to: Brett Wilton
Brett,

I saw your question regarding the usage of FastMM to report memory
leaks. As I do not have a G+ account I answer here.

I was now able to use FastMM4 with bcc32c. The original version does
fail. Please read
<https://sourceforge.net/p/fastmm/bugs/66/>
and use the solution provided by Jason DeBettencourt.

After the modification of FastMM4BCB.cpp it did work (currently tested
in a small test project only).

Regards

Hans

Am 20.03.2017 um 20:56 schrieb Brett Wilton:
C++ Builder Developers Goggle+ Group and has some discussions on David Middleton's posts on 10.2 Tokyo linker posts Part 1 and Part2

https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/118315259185736124693

Just another place to discuss C++ Builder for those interested
Brett Wilton

Posts: 44
Registered: 10/1/11
Re: G+ C++ Builder group and 10.2 discussions
Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this thread Reply
  Posted: Mar 21, 2017 12:46 PM   in response to: Johannes Weinert in response to: Johannes Weinert
Thanks Johannes, I'll go an read that now
Brett Wilton

Posts: 44
Registered: 10/1/11
Re: G+ C++ Builder group and 10.2 discussions
Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this thread Reply
  Posted: Mar 21, 2017 7:13 PM   in response to: Johannes Weinert in response to: Johannes Weinert
Just wondering Johannes if you have tested the reporting of Memory leak functionality and if it is working in that edition ?
Johannes Weinert

Posts: 70
Registered: 7/19/02
Re: G+ C++ Builder group and 10.2 discussions
Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this thread Reply
  Posted: Mar 22, 2017 12:15 AM   in response to: Brett Wilton in response to: Brett Wilton
Brett,

at the time when I wrote the news post I tested in a small project only.
I created an object with new which I didn't delete. That was detected.
Furthermore a general memory leak inside the VCL or RTL seems to be
detected.

Later I tested with a small but real program and it detected memory
leaks related to std::map and std::fstream which seem not to real.

Regards

Hans

Am 22.03.2017 um 03:13 schrieb Brett Wilton:
Just wondering Johannes if you have tested the reporting of Memory leak functionality and if it is working in that edition ?
Brett Wilton

Posts: 44
Registered: 10/1/11
Re: G+ C++ Builder group and 10.2 discussions
Click to report abuse...   Click to reply to this thread Reply
  Posted: Mar 22, 2017 1:37 PM   in response to: Johannes Weinert in response to: Johannes Weinert
Thanks Johannes, I'll need to put it through some tests to see how it performs when time allows
Legend
Helpful Answer (5 pts)
Correct Answer (10 pts)

Server Response from: ETNAJIVE02